Abuja Bureau Chief, LEON USIGBE, discusses the fight for the position of National Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) between Senator Sam Anyanwu and Sunday Ude-Okoye and its implications as it seeks to rebuild itself ahead of the 2025 general elections .
THE fight for the position of National Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) between Senator Sam Anyanwu and Sunday Ude-Okoye encapsulates a microcosm of broader challenges facing Nigeria's main opposition party. This dispute, involving legal battles, factionalism and internal governance issues, threatens to undermine the credibility of the party and its ability to position itself as a viable alternative to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
the genesis
The current leadership struggle has its roots in Anyanwu's resignation from the position of National Secretary to contest the Imo State gubernatorial election on November 11, 2023. Following his defeat, Anyanwu attempted to regain his former position, stating that His resignation did not create a vacancy as he was not formally replaced. Meanwhile, the PDP South East Zone nominated Sunday Ude-Okoye for the position, a move later confirmed by the Enugu Court of Appeal. This court ruling declared Ude-Okoye as the substantive National Secretary, citing the legitimacy of his appointment.
Ude-Okoye, now backed by the Court of Appeal ruling, took office, while Anyanwu's appeal to the Supreme Court and his request for a stay of execution complicated matters, deepening divisions within the party. Anyanwu insists that the status quo will remain until the Supreme Court delivers its verdict. This has resulted in a stalemate.
Legal dimensions, internal governance
The dispute highlights the intersection of legal procedures and internal party governance. Anyanwu has criticized Ude-Okoye for circumventing the PDP's internal dispute resolution mechanisms, arguing that leadership issues within a political party are not justiciable. This raises questions about the autonomy of political parties in managing their affairs and the role of the judiciary in resolving such disputes.
At the center of this legal conundrum is the PDP constitution, which outlines procedures for filling vacancies and resolving disputes. Anyanwu's claim that a pending application for a stay of execution legally protects his claim stands in stark contrast to the party's stated commitment to respecting judicial pronouncements. This conflict highlights a governance gap within the PDP, where internal mechanisms have failed to prevent protracted litigation.
Factionalism, erosion of unity
The leadership struggle has exposed deep factionalism within the PDP. The National Working Committee (NWC) and Board of Directors (BoT) are reportedly divided with their members aligning with Anyanwu or Ude-Okoye. Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State has expressed his public support for Ude-Okoye. This division has extended to public demonstrations of support, including protests and increased security at the party's national secretariat in Abuja.
National officials of the party have conspicuously stayed away from the national secretariat in Abuja, reportedly to avoid interactions with Anyanwu, who has consistently reported to work since the secretariat reopened last Monday after the Christmas and New Year holidays. This factionalism undermines the party's ability to project unity, a critical factor in building voter trust.
The absence of key NWC members in the secretariat, coupled with the abrupt cancellation of the committee's scheduled meeting last week, indicates an organization struggling with internal discord. Makinde recently noted that Nigerians are looking for alternatives to the ruling APC, but observers agree that a divided PDP risks squandering this opportunity by failing to present a cohesive front.
Implications for the credibility and electoral prospects of the PDP
The leadership crisis poses significant risks to the credibility of the PDP. Observers believe that as the party prepares for its 2025 national convention and subsequent elections, prolonged internal disputes could alienate members and erode public trust. The perception of a party incapable of managing its affairs effectively diminishes its appeal as a credible alternative to the APC.
Furthermore, the crisis highlights a broader trend of institutional weakness within the PDP. Experts say the inability to enforce internal resolutions and reliance on the judiciary to resolve disputes point to systemic problems in governance. This not only hampers the party's operational efficiency but also provides ammunition for political rivals to question its readiness to govern at the national level.
The role of external influences, particularly accusations of APC interference, adds another layer of complexity. PDP National Publicity Secretary Debo Ologunagba's allegations of external meddling underline the vulnerability of opposition parties in Nigeria's political landscape. Whether these accusations are valid or not, they divert attention from the PDP's internal challenges and further weaken its public position.
The rule of law, political stability
While hosting members of the PDP NWC on a condolence visit over the food stampede deaths in Ibadan recently, Governor Makinde expressed his support for Ude-Okoye and emphasized adherence to the rule of law as a way to resolve the crisis. “Yes, this New Year has given us the opportunity to talk about developments within our party, especially issues related to the rule of law. There is a judicial ruling on the issue of the National Secretariat. My position was clear from day one and I will always respect the rule of law. This is the new National Secretary by judicial pronouncement. I said without mincing words that we will stay on the side of the law.”
The governor called for sacrifices for the sake of party unity, reflecting the need for a conciliatory approach. However, the challenge lies in translating this rhetoric into action. Both plaintiffs must prioritize the party's collective interest over individual ambitions, a task easier said than done in Nigeria's high-stakes political environment.
The broader implications of this crisis extend beyond the PDP. A weakened opposition undermines Nigeria's democratic health by limiting voters' choices. As Makinde rightly pointed out, Nigerians do not want a one-party state. The PDP's ability to resolve its internal conflicts and present a united front is crucial to maintaining a competitive political landscape.
Paths to resolution
Resolving the leadership struggle requires a multi-pronged approach. First, the PDP must strengthen its internal governance mechanisms to prevent future disputes. This includes reviewing your constitution to clarify procedures for handling resignations, filling vacancies and resolving disputes. Second, party leaders must facilitate dialogue between warring factions. A mediated settlement could avoid new litigation and restore a semblance of unity.
Third, the PDP must address the root causes of factionalism, including issues of trust and nominations for public office. Transparent decision-making processes and equitable distribution of positions can mitigate grievances and foster cohesion. Finally, the party must manage its public image by demonstrating a commitment to the rule of law and internal democracy. Effective communication strategies can help rebuild public trust in the PDP leadership.
Analysts say the fight for the position of National Secretary between Anyanwu and Ude-Okoye is symptomatic of deeper challenges within the PDP. This dispute, characterized by legal battles, factionalism and governance gaps, threatens to undermine the credibility of the party and its ability to serve as a viable alternative to the APC. To resolve this crisis it is necessary to respect the rule of law, strengthen internal governance and commit to unity.
As the party navigates this turbulent period, its ability to overcome internal divisions will determine its prospects for future electoral success. In the words of Governor Makinde, Nigerians are looking for alternatives. Political experts recommend that the PDP must rise to this challenge by putting its house in order and presenting a united front. Failure to do so runs the risk of ceding the political landscape to the ruling party. This is a scenario that, in Makinde's eyes, is detrimental to Nigeria's democratic future.
READ ALSO: The gap in the PPD deepens